All about dinosaurs, fossils and prehistoric animals by Everything Dinosaur team members.
4 04, 2017

The Cognitive Abilities of Neanderthals

By |2023-06-13T09:59:04+01:00April 4th, 2017|Dinosaur and Prehistoric Animal News Stories, Main Page|0 Comments

Carved Raven Leg Bone Hints at Sophisticated Neanderthals

An international team of scientists, including researchers from the Université de Bordeaux (France), Cambridge University and the University of the Witwatersrand, (Johannesburg, South Africa), have published a paper in the on line journal PLOS One reporting on the discovery of a fragment of bone with seven notches that seem to have been deliberately carved into it.  The bone, a radius (lower leg bone), from a Raven (Corvus corax), represents the first instance of a bird bone from a Neanderthal site bearing modifications that cannot be explained as the result of butchery activities and for which a symbolic argument can be built on direct rather than circumstantial evidence.

Changing Views About Neanderthals

Palaeoanthropologists are changing their views about the Neanderthals, for so long our closest relative had been depicted as brutish “ape-men”, but there is a growing body of evidence to suggest that Neanderthals were sophisticated, they had a culture and their cognitive abilities may have been underestimated.  Neanderthals were sophisticated and capable of abstract thought.

Seven Notches Carved with Care into the Raven Bone

Raven bone may have been deliberately carved by a Neanderthal

Various views of the carved raven bone.

Picture credit: PLOS One

When first described by fieldworkers, the raven bone was regarded as an intentionally notched object, possibly used as an eyeless needle in which the notches may have been used to fix a thread or perhaps the leg bone was carved as a form of decoration.

For models and replicas of Neanderthals (whilst stocks last): CollectA Prehistoric Life Figures.

A Neanderthal Rock Shelter in Crimea

The bone was found amongst debris which included a variety of bird bones in a rock shelter located in the Crimean Mountains (Zaskalnaya VI rock shelter).  The bone comes from a layer associated with stone tools that indicate that the notches were carved between 43,000 and 38,000 years ago (Micoquian stone tool technology of the Middle Palaeolithic).   The scientists set out to recreate the marks using turkey leg bones and to examine the degree of regularity and intentionality of the set of notches.  Microscopic analysis suggests that they were produced by a careful to-and-fro movement of a sharp stone blade across the bone and that two notches were added to fill in the gap between previously cut notches, probably to increase the visual consistency of the pattern or perhaps to increase the object’s utility.

The Location of the Rock Shelter (Zaskalnaya VI rock shelter)

Neanderthal rock shelter (Crimea)

(Zaskalnaya VI rock shelter).

Picture credit: PLOS One

A Happy Hunting Ground for Scientists

The Crimea and southern Russia have proved a happy hunting ground for archaeologists and palaeontologists studying the distribution and dispersal of Neanderthals.  Several sites are known from eastern Crimea (notably the open sites at Karabai and Sary-Kaya).  On the western side, there is a collapsed cave (Kabazi), that has also yielded a number of significant H.  neanderthalensis related discoveries.

Much of the research in this part of the world has been focused on assessing how well adapted the Neanderthals were to the cold.  Despite a number of papers having been published that suggests the Neanderthals were biologically better adapted to a cold climate than our own species (H. sapiens), evidence from the Crimea challenges this.  Settlement can be plotted against climate fluctuations, with more northerly settlement coinciding with inter-glacial warm periods.  A number of eminent figures have stated that Neanderthals were no more cold adapted than anatomically modern humans.

Neanderthal Technology Helped Them Survive the Cold

In recent research (Aiello and Wheeler), it was concluded that physiological traits can only have made a modest difference to Neanderthal survival potential and that the easiest solution to keeping warm was culture led not biologically driven.  To survive the cold, the answer is more insulation this equates to better clothing that is better made.

Could the carved notches in the bone played a role in helping to sort ties and fastenings for clothing?

A Close View of the Notches Carved into the Raven Leg Bone

Carved notches on a Raven's leg bone.

Magnified images showing the uniformity of the carved notches.

Picture credit: PLOS One

The picture shows a profile view (top) and a view of the cut marks (dorsal view).  Photograph (a) shows notches 1-3, (b) shows a magnified view of the notches 4-5 and picture (c) shows notches 6-7 (scale bar 1 mm).

A Skilful Neanderthal with a Sharp Eye

A statistical analysis of the spacing in conjunction with experiments undertaken on turkey bones to recreate the marks, suggest that the carver took great care over the placement and the precision of the notches.  The marks could have had a symbolic meaning for the maker, the researchers conclude that although there is still a lot of controversy surrounding the idea of whether Neanderthal cognition was comparable to H. sapiens, the cuts in the bone are not from butchery, the engravings show great artistry and skill.  This evidence demonstrates the idea that there may have been more to the Neanderthals than previously thought.

Researchers Attempted to Recreate the Cut Marks in Turkey Bones

Turkey bone carving to mimic Neanderthal behaviour.

Researchers attempt to recreate the marks made by Neanderthals.

Picture credit: Francesco d’Errico (Université de Bordeaux)

To read an article that suggests Neanderthals may have has some medicinal knowledge: Neanderthals and Aspirin.

For a feature on redefining the Neanderthals: Changing Perceptions About Homo neanderthalensis

The scientific paper: “A Decorated Raven Bone from the Zaskalnaya VI (Kolosovskaya) Neanderthal site, Crimea”, by Ana Majkić, Sarah Evans, Vadim Stepanchuk, Alexander Tsvelykh, Francesco d’Errico published in PLOS One.

Visit Everything Dinosaur’s website: Everything Dinosaur.

3 04, 2017

No Visual Difference Between Boy Dinosaurs and Girl Dinosaurs

By |2023-06-13T09:42:58+01:00April 3rd, 2017|Dinosaur and Prehistoric Animal News Stories, Dinosaur Fans, Main Page|1 Comment

No Sexual Dimorphism in the Dinosauria

A couple of weeks ago, Everything Dinosaur reported on the publishing of a new scientific paper that set out to re-define the Dinosauria.  A new model for plotting the various branches of the dinosaur family tree has been proposed, meat-eating dinosaurs such as Tyrannosaurus rex and Velociraptor find themselves aligned with the ornithischians (bird-hipped dinosaurs), whereas iconic dinosaurs such as Diplodocus and the less iconic Herrerasaurus might just be outside of the Dinosauria altogether.  A new study has just been published that postulates that there was no sexual dimorphism within the Dinosauria.

To read more about the reclassification of the dinosaurs: Root and Branch Reform of the Dinosaur Family Tree.

That’s science, fundamental principles get challenged and in the light of new evidence, accepted thinking can be overturned.

Challenging the Idea of Sexual Dimorphism in the Dinosauria

Also, last month, Dr Jordan Mallon, palaeontologist and post-doctoral fellow of the Canadian Museum of Nature, published in the journal “Paleobiology” a fascinating article which challenges another fundamental precept of dinosaurs.  Dr Mallon argues that there is no proof that male dinosaurs looked different from females.

Many Scientific Papers Had Proposed Evidence for Sexual Dimorphism in Dinosaurs (including Stegosaurs)

The difference between girl and boy stegosaurids.

Females may have had reduced plates that were more spiky.

Picture credit: Evan Siatta with additional annotation by Everything Dinosaur

The Emperor’s New Clothes Syndrome

Dr Mallon conducted a detailed statistical analysis on nine different dinosaur taxa.  Dinosaurs that have relatively well-documented fossil records, including skull material which is believed to represent animals of different ages (ontogenetic stages), dinosaurs about which sexual dimorphism has been reported, inferred or at least debated in the past.

The dinosaurs studied:

  1. Coelophysis bauri
  2. Coelophysis rhodesiensis
  3. Stegoceras validum
  4. Allosaurus fragilis
  5. Stegosaurus mjosi
  6. Kentrosaurus aethiopicus
  7. Tyrannosaurus rex
  8. Plateosaurus sp.
  9. Protoceratops andrewsi

With crocodilians and many birds displaying sexual dimorphism, take alligators and the often-cited peacocks for example, as these animals are closely related to the Dinosauria, then surely dinosaurs were sexually dimorphic too?  But it could it be a case of the “Emperor’s New Clothes”?  Scientists expected to find evidence in the fossil record demonstrating differences between the boys and the girls and a large body of evidence based on the shape and size of bones has been gathered to reinforce this hypothesis – but just how valid is this idea?

An Extensive Statistical Analysis Searching for Evidence of Sexual Dimorphism

Dr Mallon set about conducting a wide-ranging, in-depth statistical analysis of sexual dimorphism in the Dinosauria, the first such investigation, as far as we, at Everything Dinosaur, are aware.   Previously published papers were re-visited including the intriguingly titled “The King’s New Clothes: A Fresh Look at Tyrannosaurus rex”, written by our chum Pete Larson, twenty years ago.  In addition, amongst the numerous papers referenced in his thought-provoking piece: “Recognising Sexual Dimorphism in the Fossil Record: Lessons from Nonavian Dinosaurs”, Dr Mallon looked at the research undertaken in 2015 by Maiorino, Farke, Kotsakis and Piras* into Protoceratops andrewsi, one of the species subjected to statistical analysis in this new study.

In the Maiorino et al paper, a number of examples of sexually dimorphic traits were listed amongst the Ceratopsia (see table below).

Sexually Dimorphic Traits within Horned Dinosaurs

Sexual dimorphism in horned dinosaurs.

A table outlining proposed sexual dimorphism in horned dinosaurs.

Table credit: L. Maiorino et al (from a paper also referenced by Dr Mallon).

Skull Measurements Not Characteristic of Sexual Dimorphism

The team concluded that anatomical traits such as the height and width of the frill and skull size thus may not be sexually dimorphic.  When careful measurements were considered, it seems that the size of the frill and skull size could not determine the boys from the girls, at least not in this Asian Late Cretaceous dinosaur.

Trying to Spot the Girls Amongst the Boys (P. andrewsi)

Assessing sexual dimorphism in Protoceratops.

Using frill and skull measurements to identify sexual dimorphism in Protoceratops.

Picture credit: L. Maiorino et al

Dr Mallon concurs.  In the 2015 study, scientists measured a number of traits within a sample set of twenty-nine Protoceratops skulls.

They measured:

1 – Width of the frill.
2 – Postorbital width of the skull.
3 – Length of the frill.
4 – Width of the skull across jugals.
5 – Nasal height of the skull.
6 – Height of the frill.
7 – Length of external nares.
8 – Width of external nares.

The 2015 study could not determine two distinct clusters of measurements when the skulls were assessed.  If they had, then these two unambiguous groups would have supported the idea that Protoceratops at least, exhibited sexual dimorphism.

Protoceratops One of Nine Different Dinosaurs Incorporated within the Study

Protoceratops on display.

A Protoceratops exhibit on display at The Naturmuseum Senckenberg (Frankfurt, Germany). Picture credit: Everything Dinosaur.

Picture credit: Everything Dinosaur

Why is Sexual Dimorphism in the Dinosauria Such a Big Deal?

The fossil record can only tell us so much.  For instance, inferring behaviour is extremely difficult.  Most palaeontologists now agree that many dinosaurs lived in herds (should that be flocks)?  If sexual dimorphism can be identified that it will provide critical information about the role of sexual selection in the evolution of different types of dinosaurs, as well as supporting the idea that many dinosaurs indulged in visual displays and intraspecific combat.

Dr Mallon argues that quantifiable data to support this hypothesis is often lacking.  A review of existing literature was undertaken to identify quantitative evidence for differences between the boy dinosaurs and the girls and according to this new research, the good doctor could find no evidence for sexual dimorphism in the nine taxa studied.

This contradicts many existing perceptions, but as with all science it is a question of evaluating the evidence.

Looking for Medullary Bone

Dr Mallon states that he can’t be certain that dinosaurs were not sexually dimorphic, it’s just that the available evidence precludes its detection.  A helpful start would be to positively identify females by the presence of unlaid eggs in the body cavity or medullary bone within fossil material and indeed there have been some examples already found.  However, more data is needed before we can positively distinguish the males from the females.

Things would of course be much easier, if nonavian dinosaurs were still around today.  All we would need is some volunteers willing to lift the tail of a Triceratops or probe the private parts of a Pachycephalosaurus, would anyone want to give it a try?

* The Protoceratops paper: L. Maiorino , A. A. Farke , T. Kotsakis , and P. Piras . 2015. “Males resemble Females: Re-evaluating Sexual Dimorphism in Protoceratops andrewsi (Neoceratopsia, Protoceratopsidae)”. PLoS ONE 10:e0126464. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126464.

An article published in December 2016 that looks at the potential evolutionary advantage of different sized members of the same Coelophysis flock: Sizing Up Early Dinosaurs – Variation an Evolutionary Advantage.

Visit the award-winning Everything Dinosaur website: Visit Everything Dinosaur’s Website.

2 04, 2017

Update on Dinosaur Diorama “Jurassic Park 3”

By |2023-06-13T09:30:13+01:00April 2nd, 2017|Dinosaur Fans, Everything Dinosaur Products, Main Page, Photos of Everything Dinosaur Products|0 Comments

Dinosaur Diorama Planted Up

Robert Townsend’s huge dinosaur diorama is coming along nicely.  With the hard landscaping completed including the creation of a central waterhole, the next stage is to decide where and how to put the variety of plants and rocks to really bring the prehistoric scene to life.

It is important to choose plant models and other landscape features wisely, in addition, careful consideration needs to be given as to where to locate these items amongst the various focal points of the diorama.  For example, plants tend to accumulate around sources of water, so in order to give a model a more natural look, it is important to consider how the vegetation layout close to imitation rivers and ponds should look.

Planting Commences Around the Waterhole

Planting a dinosaur themed diorama.

Tropical plants beside the waterhole.

Picture credit: Robert Townsend

Developing a Dinosaur Diorama

Note the surface around the water source has been roughened somewhat.  Despite the action of the water, the constant traffic of large animals coming to drink at the waterhole would lead to a considerable amount of churning up of the mud surrounding the pond.  This churning caused by the movement of dinosaurs is called “dinoturbation”.  Sandstones and mudstones associated with dinosaur trackways often preserve evidence of damage to the ground caused by the passage of large dinosaurs.

Dinosaur Footsteps Sculpted into the Landscape

CollectA Williamsonia and dinosaur tracks.

CollectA Williamsonia plant model draws attention to the dinosaur tracks.

Picture credit: Robert Townsend

Prehistoric Plants in the Landscape

Away from the water, planting can be sparser, but the innovative modeller will use other techniques and devices to add interest and intrigue to their dioramas.  Five tridactyl dinosaur footprints have been carved into the Polyfilla base.  Not the lack of width of the track, very typical of the “narrow gauge” of most three-toed dinosaurs.  The CollectA Williamsonia model plant has been placed adjacent to the tracks, making a focal point within this section of the landscape.

Trees and Rocks of Different Shapes and Sizes Add Interest

Trees and rocks for the prehistoric scene.

Jungle area with rocks adjacent to the waterhole.

Picture credit: Robert Townsend

CollectA Prehistoric Plants and Trees

The CollectA Palm Tree model has been skilfully used to add height to the planting.  Note the sloping gradient, water would tend to accumulate at the lowest points within a locality, this attention to detail helps to emphasise the natural look of the diorama.  The CollectA Monathesia and Cycad cluster has been located to the right of the waterhole and it blends in nicely within the smaller, tufts of vegetation that have been placed along the water’s edge.

The CollectA range includes a variety of prehistoric plants and trees.  The prehistoric plants and trees are in scale with CollectA dinosaur figures.

To view the CollectA range of not-to-scale models: CollectA Dinosaurs and Prehistoric Plant Models.

Clothes Pegs Have a Variety of Uses

Clothes pegs used in tree model making.

Clothes pegs are handy to keep models in place until the glue dries.

Picture credit: Robert Townsend

The Corners of the Dinosaur Diorama

Planting the far corner can present a challenge to even the most experienced model maker.  Robert wanted to create some height using hand-crafted tree ferns, but tall trunks can present a problem when it comes to securing them in position long enough to permit the adhesive to dry.  Model makers use a variety of tools and in this instance clothes pegs were press-ganged into service to ensure the planting was a success.

Creating a Balanced Planting Effect with Other Landscape Features

Jungle area with rocks.

Nearing completion, the jungle area with more planting and rocks.

Picture credit: Robert Townsend

The planting for the “Jurassic Park III” landscape is nearly finished.  Robert commented, stating that this phase of the project was “about eighty-five percent complete”.  As with all stages of the project, it proves very beneficial just to spend some time laying out features such as trees, rocks and railway modellers lichen and moss to create exotic bushes prior to reaching for the glue gun.

Robert is aiming for a relatively neutral planting scheme, one that could represent any one of three geological periods of the Mesozoic.  It seems that this massive project is progressing along nicely and we look forward to seeing the end result.

Take a look at the Everything Dinosaur website: Everything Dinosaur.

1 04, 2017

New Species of Daspletosaurus Announced

By |2023-06-13T09:16:58+01:00April 1st, 2017|Dinosaur and Prehistoric Animal News Stories, Dinosaur Fans, Main Page|0 Comments

Tyrannosaurids with Sensitive Snouts (Daspletosaurus horneri)

Scientists based in the United States have announced the discovery of a second species of Daspletosaurus, a member of the tyrannosaur family and analysis of the skull and jaws indicate that these carnivores, like crocodilians, had sensitive snouts.

The new species has been named Daspletosaurus horneri, “Horner’s frightful lizard”, the trivial name honours palaeontologist Jack Horner.  John “Jack” Horner, was believed to be the inspiration for the character of Alan Grant in Michael Crichton’s novel “Jurassic Park”.  From relatively humble beginnings, Horner established himself as one of the world’s most famous and eminent palaeontologists.  In late 2015, he announced his retirement from the post of Curator of Palaeontology at the Museum of Rockies after thirty-three years in the post.

The Facial Features of Daspletosaurus horneri

The facial features of Daspletosaurus horneri.

Bone texture indicates large zones of large, flat scales and subordinate regions of armour-like skin. Integumentary sense organs occur on the flat scales that cover the densest regions of neurovascular foramina. The region outside of the crocodilian-like skin is reconstructed with small scales after fossilised skin impressions of tyrannosaurids.

Picture credit: Dino Pulerà

Daspletosaurus horneri and Daspletosaurus torosus

Fossils from an adult, a subadult and a lower jaw ascribed to a juvenile were found in close proximity in strata that forms the upper portion of the Two Medicine Formation (Montana).  A phylogenetic analysis places this new tyrannosaurid as the sister species to Daspletosaurus torosus, named in 1970, when fossil material formerly associated with the genus Gorgosaurus was reassessed and assigned to a new genus.  D. torosus is known from strata that dates from between 76.7 mya to 75.2 mya.

The fossils ascribed to D. horneri are found in slightly younger rocks, estimated to date from 75.1 mya to 74.4 mya.   Given how closely related these two dinosaurs were, their geographical proximity and temporal succession, the researchers postulate that these two forms of Daspletosaurus represent a single anagenetic lineage.

An Illustration of Daspletosaurus (D. torosus)

Drawing of Daspletosaurus.

A scale drawing of Daspletosaurus.  Picture credit: Everything Dinosaur.

Picture credit: Everything Dinosaur

The picture (above) shows an illustration based on the CollectA Age of Dinosaurs Daspletosaurus model.

To view the CollectA model range: CollectA Age of Dinosaurs Popular Range.

What is an Anagenetic Lineage?

Lead author of the paper, Professor Thomas Carr and his collaborators, argue that Daspletosaurus horneri evolved directly from its older, close relative Daspletosaurus torosus.  This is a form of evolution known as anagenesis – one species gradually evolves over a period of time into a new species.  An anagenetic lineage occurs when one population representing a single species, over thousands and thousands of years, gradually accumulates change.  These changes eventually become sufficiently distinct from the earlier form that descendants can be labelled a brand new species.

The Skull and Jaws of the Daspletosaurus horneri Holotype

Skull and jaws of D. horneri with line drawings.

Views of the skull and jaws of the holotype fossil material (D. horneri).

Picture credit: Scientific Reports

The picture above shows photographs and line drawings of some of the holotype fossil material (skull and jaws – MOR 590).  Photograph (A) shows MOR 590 in left lateral view, (B) represents the line drawing of this fossil material.  In photograph (C) an anterior view of the skull material is shown, (D) is the accompanying line drawing.  Photograph (E) shows the skull in dorsal (top down) view, with (F), the line drawing of the top of the skull.

Sensitive Nerves on the Face of Daspletosaurus

Facial bone texture indicates a scaly skin, no sign of lips but a vast array of sensitive nerve openings (foramina).  The researchers conclude that these foramina would have allowed hundreds of branches of the trigeminal nerve to reach the surface of the snout, turning the dinosaur’s face into a sensitive third “hand”.

The scientists, which include David Varricchio (Montana State University) and Jayc Sedlmayr (School of Medicine, Louisiana State University) compared these structures to the beaks of birds and the snouts of living crocodilians.  Crocodiles and alligators have thousands of integumentary sensory organs around their jaws, the jaws help these reptiles to explore and understand their surroundings.

Commenting on the similarities between living crocodiles and the MOR 590 skull and jaw material, lead author Professor Thomas Carr stated:

“Given that the foramina are identical in Tyrannosaurs, [that] indicates that they had super-sensitive skin as well.”

The trigeminal nerve plays a special sensory role in many mammals, reptiles and birds, carrying sensory signals from whiskers and electrical receptors and enabling snakes such as the pit viper to home in on infrared radiation from warm-blooded prey.  The snouts and jaws of tyrannosaurids could have been very sensitive, it has been speculated that these dinosaurs could have rubbed their faces together during courtship.  Although, this is just speculation, similar behaviour is seen in extant animals today, so amorous tyrannosaurids could have rubbed their snouts together as part of bond forming or pre-mating rituals.

To read an article about potential courtship behaviour in theropod dinosaurs: Dance of the Dinosaurs.

Visit the award-winning Everything Dinosaur website: Everything Dinosaur.

Go to Top